Bugs and Problems Forum

BIG differences in elevation FORUMS HOME SEARCH FORUMS

Total posts in this topic: 2
Showing newest posts first - Show oldest first
Sign in to post to this topicSIGN IN

    Page: 
    • 1
  • Photo
    plotaroute admin   Wednesday 15 May 2019 09:18:39

    Hi Regina,

    I'm afraid there is no definitive "correct" figure for Total Ascent - every application calculates it differently, so you can't compare figures from different sources.  We've looked into this at this a lot in the past (see this thread for past discussions on the topic) and have realised that we'll be constantly chasing our tail if we try to match calculations from other sources. The best advice we can give is to only compare ascent calculations from plotaroute with those of other routes mapped on plotaroute, rather than with figures obtained elsewhere - what is important is how figures from the same source relate to each other.

    John

  • Photo
    Topic
    Creator
    Regina Jensen   Tuesday 14 May 2019 20:41:24

    I have the same route mapped with plotaroute and ridewithgpa, and there is a big difference in the climbing (elevation). Plotaroute says 3031/ft and ridewithgps says 2136/ft. Why the difference and which is correct? 

    https://www.plotaroute.com/route/829949?units=miles

    https://ridewithgps.com/routes/29963945

     

Page: 
  • 1